By Daniel Link
1 - What does "critical essay" and what place it in your writing practice?
understand "critical test" as a variant of the argument, of course. A "critical test" is also a way to read something (designed, of course, always as a text, ie a tissue). I write critical essays according to various protocols.
2 - What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of the practice of critical essay?
The question is confusing because it calls "practical" to "critical essay", but at the same time seems to imply that the "critical test" is a drug product with a therapeutic action and contraindications. What are the advantages and disadvantages of any practice?
3 - What do you think is the ability / possibility of political intervention in the critical essay?
Various levels of response: If the "trial critical "is a mode of argument and emphatic affirmation of reading, reading, gender is a politically involved against the wave of widespread barbarism imposed as a culture. Further (or closer) that we should say that all reading is strategic and as such, is a battlefield in relation to which defines positions are, indeed, political.
In a more limited level, there will be "critical test" which will be strictly political matters (ie, which focus explicitly political issues or at least with respect to a common horizon expectations are immediately seconded to the political languages).
4 - What lines of the national tradition of critical essay considers relevant and why?
talk about "relevance" implies that the "tradition" has no conflicts. MartÃnez Estrada is perhaps the most ambitious of our essayists (a great reader, plus an enviable prose). Thereafter, naming names would be too naive, but we can not forget Oscar Masotta and, more contemporaneously, Cesar Aira and Alan Pauls.
5 - What keeps the relationship considered critical test critical academic work? Foreign
disconcerting. The institution and the "critical essay" presuppose each other, but not always their goals are the same. In any case, the "critical test" is less positivist than any institution.
6 - What cultural bodies considered priority at the heart of his critical work?
already said, the culture (if you prefer, say the "cultural hegemony", but it seems a tautology, and it never fully understood the tenets of Gramsci) should be denied in their current modes of appearance.
7 - What think are the relationships between critical essay and the book market?
not think there is a specific relationship between "critical test" and publishing market. In short, the words moving because there is a linguistic market and circulation of symbolic goods because no market of symbolic goods. I could not answer in five lines the relationship between any type of linguistic or symbolic action and the market.
8 - What are your guidelines when working to address the critical essay?
Discover things to know before. My work generally falls within the field of comparative literature, studies gender and criticism of this. It seems to insist that much (so they say) in the literary process of institutionalization and the constitution of subjectivity and individuality.
9 - What contemporary essayists considers relevant and why?
Those who strive to push the boundaries of the legible, which discusses the canonical readings, those who are questioning themselves. In general, they are my friends and because they are superfluous to name them.
10 - What are the prospects for continuity is critical essay in the new generation of writers?
new perspective. So I see (I hope). What can be noted, with alarm, is the lack of literary criticism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment